Legal Opinion

Foxx v. Bill's Superfoods, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 25, 2017No. CV-17-38Published

1Opinion of the CourtRobert J. Gladwin, Judge

hThe Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) denied Harold L. Foxx’s claim for neck and back injuries. On appeal, Foxx argues that the Commission erred by failing to admit additional evidence and by determining that the claim was not compensable. We affirm.

Foxx worked part time for appellee Bill’s Superfoods, -Inc. (Bill’s), when he sustained a compensable injury to his right leg and groin on May 23, 2013. When Foxx later made claims for neck and back injuries from the same accident, Bill’s 'controverted the claims. At the hearing before the administrative law judge (ALJ), Foxx…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Cooper v. Hiland DairyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Pafford Medical Billing Services, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Haygood v. BelcherCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Blevins v. Safeway StoresCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API