Legal Opinion

Peterson v. David

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1966No. 38392PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is a consolidated case involving two actions seeking forfeiture of rights under real estate sales contracts. Mr. and Mrs. Max D. Hughes, the defendants who have appealed, argue that they were denied due process, in violation of art. 1, § 3, of the Washington Constitution, and the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, by the proceedings below.

Dispute exists as to various facts of the procedural gymnastics involved; however, certain undisputed facts, ascertained with some difficulty from the briefs and the record, seem significant. In March 1963, Mr. and Mrs. Dallas…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. BennettWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Reser v. LabudeWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Moe v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. Eastham v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. Nestegard v. Investment Exchange Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. Seidler v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API