Legal Opinion

State v. McVay

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1970No. 66PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

Defendants excepted to and assign as error the consolidation for trial of the four indictments. This assignment is without merit. The State’s motion for consolidation was addressed to the sound discretion of the presiding judge. State v. Yoes, 271 N.C. 616, 641, 157 S.E. 2d 386, 406, and cases cited. There is no basis for a contention that he abused his discretion. Ordinarily, consolidation is appropriate when the offenses charged are of the same class and are so connected in time and place that evidence at the trial upon one of the indictments would be competent and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. TuggleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API