Ground Improvement Techniques, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Chief Judge.
Ground Improvement Techniques, Inc. (“GIT”) appeals decisions by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims holding that GIT is not the real party in interest, granting the real party in interest’s motion for substitution and denying GIT’s motion to continue as plaintiff, and dismissing certain of GIT’s claims for lack of jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the decisions of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.
BaCkground
In 1988, the Department of Energy (“DOE”) entered into a prime contract with Morrison Knudson Company, Inc. (the “MK prime contract”) for multiple…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- City of El Centro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- William O. Schism and Robert Reinlie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bitmanagement Software Gmbh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Panther Brands, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Urs Energy & Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016