Legal Opinion
Ward v. Roger
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1906PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Demurrer to complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtBueb, J.
The plaintiff brings this action to recover damages for injuries sustained by falling through a hole in the floor of a privy vault. A portion of the floor had been removed, and the opening was left unguarded. Each of the defendants separately demur to the complaint upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The allegation of the complaint is that the defendant Abram S. Post, as committee of the said John Eogers, “ is *300the owner of the premises in question.” The complaint further alleges, however, that the defendant John Rogers was duly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marie v. . GarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- First National Bank v. . ShulerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Williams v. . HaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Matter of Application of OtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Kent v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. Guaranty Estates Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Campbell v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Rooney v. People's Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1908
- Robinson v. People's BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953