Legal Opinion

Markham v. Gottsegen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 15, 1965No. 4829PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KANNER, Judge (Ret.).

Sanford Gottsegen, plaintiff-appellee, brought suit in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County on an Ohio judgment recovered against defendants-appellants, Ethel M. Markham and E. A. Markham, founded on a cognovit promissory note in the principal sum of $20,000 which the Markhams had executed on March 20, 1928. Both parties moved for summary judgment; and the court, denying the motion of the Markhams, rendered summary judgment for Gottsegen in the sum of $81,793.54.

By his amended complaint, Gottsegen averred that Union Properties, Inc., on May 12, 1941, obtained a judgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Owens v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Kingston v. QuimbySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Union National Bank v. LambSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Hepler v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Rice, Brown & Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Markham v. GottsegenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API