Legal Opinion
Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. v. City of Dayton
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 23, 1997No. 96-3977PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J., joined by Suhrheinrich, J.,
JONES, J. (pp. 1146-47), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the result.
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. (“WMO”) appeals the district court’s order that found a lack of jurisdiction to address its dispute with Defendant-Appellee City of Dayton (the “City”). The underlying dispute concerns whether the City, by virtue of its post-settlement actions, is es-topped from refusing to approve WMO’s construction of buildings on the south side of a landfill property, instead of the west side as originally designated in a consent decree between the parties.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Re/max International, Inc., Re/max Northeast Ohio Limited Partnership, Intervenors-Appellees v. Realty One, Inc., Smythe, Cramer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Futernick v. Sumpter TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. City of Loveland, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- East Brooks Books, Inc. v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Shy v. Navistar International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.