Legal Opinion
United States v. City of Loveland, Ohio
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 15, 2010No. 10-3116PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Defendant City of Loveland appeals the district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings in favor of plaintiff Hamilton County Board of Commissioners, effectively preventing Loveland from terminating a 1985 sewage treatment agreement. Love-land argues that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction and erred by granting judgment on the pleadings. We disagree and therefore affirm.
I
The City of Loveland, Ohio, is located in the greater Cincinnati metropolitan area. In 1970, Loveland put into operation its Polk Run Waste Water Treatment Plant and sewer…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. WingetCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- McKeon Prods. v. Howard S. Leight & Assocs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs of Hamilton Cty.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Bone v. Taco Bell of America, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2013
- CPC Livestock, LLC v. Fifth Third Bank, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Wuliger v. Cannella Response Television, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.