Legal Opinion

Yancey v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 2000No. 86-CF-696, 94-CO-1420PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a trial by jury, appellant Keith Yancey was convicted of first-degree burglary while armed and first-degree felony murder while armed. Appellant’s later motion for collateral relief pursuant to D.C.Code § 23-110 (1996 Repl.) was denied following a hearing before Judge Cheryl M. Long. In this consolidated appeal from his convictions and the denial of the post-trial motion, appellant raises a number of contentions, most of which are related to the preparation and performance of his trial counsel, who took over his case shortly before trial after appellant’s earlier retained counsel…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pinkney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Leak v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Cade v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Shields v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Pinkney v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API