Legal Opinion

Delfosse v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1955No. 19105PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The contract for the sale of land, which the petition in count one seeks to have specifically performed, or in count two to recover damages because of an alleged breach thereof, is fatally defective in that it relates to only 36 lots of a group of 51 as shown on the plat referred to, and there is nothing therein to identify the 36 lots referred to. Also, it is expressly made subject to approval of tentative layout of subdivision without indicating whose approval; and it is expressly subject to approval of construction and permanent-loan financing without intimating…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haygood v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  2. Marsh v. BairdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  3. Bowles v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McMichael Realty & Insurance Agency, Inc. v. TysingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Carver v. City of MoultrieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API