Carver v. City of Moultrie
Supreme Court of Georgia
1ConcurrenceCarley, Justice
Although I agree that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, it is my opinion that this case does not meet the criteria for affirmance pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 59. After reviewing the case law and issues raised in this appeal, I think that an opinion would benefit the Bench and the Bar and, thus, would have precedential value. Therefore, I write to state why I believe that the trial court correctly granted summary judgment in this case.
Lamar Carver and Clyde Carver (Carvers) brought suit against' the City of Moultrie (City), seeking specific performance of, or, in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- North & Co. v. Mendel & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Smith v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Beckworth v. BeckworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Borum v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.