Legal Opinion

Jones v. Bob Cason Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1942No. 30768PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an action upon a promissory note, and at the conclusion of the trial judgment was entered for the plaintiff. Defendants made no defense to the merits of the action, but objected on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to comply with 68 O. S. 1941 § 1515, relating to the payment of intangible personal property tax. The record negatives the contention that such tax was not paid.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the appeal is frivolous and taken for delay only. A response has been filed. From an examination of the motion, the response thereto, brief of plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. AronoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Smith v. Graham Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Humphreys v. Liberty Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Christner v. ChristnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API