Legal Opinion

Smith v. Graham Brown Shoe Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1937No. 27547PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action on account. Judgment was for the plaintiff. Plaintiff introduced as his case certain depositions to prove his account.

The sole issue argued in the defendant’s brief is that the exhibits of depositions constituting the account were never properly identified. No contest was raised as to the payment or otherwise in the trial court. The account was not specifically denied, and it is not urged here that the exhibits are incorrect. No defense is presented. We have held that where a motion to dismiss has been filed which challenges the appeal on the ground that it is without merit…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. ShafferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Offutt v. Fizz-O Water Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Jones v. Bob Cason Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Baker v. MarcusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Stone v. Oklahoma City Ex Rel. LaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API