Smith v. Aronoff
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
This is an action on account. Judgment wag for the plaintiff. Plaintiff introduced as his case certain depositions to prove his account.
The sole issue argued in the defendant’s brief is that the exhibits of depositions constituting the account were never properly identified. No contest was raised as to the payment or otherwise in the trial court. The account was not specifically denied, and it is not urged here that the exhibits are incorrect. No defense is presented. "We have held that where a motion to dismiss has been filed which challenges the appeal on the ground that it is without merit…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Atkinson v. ShafferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Jones v. Bob Cason Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Baker v. MarcusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Stone v. Oklahoma City Ex Rel. LaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Van Pelt v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950