Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. DeBarrows

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided January 17, 1995No. CGCMS 24045; Misc. Docket No. 001-94; Docket No. 1044Published

1Concurrence

Judge O’HARA

(concurring):

While I generally agree with the opinion of the Court, I feel that the major issues raised in this case deserve further elaboration.

Convening Authority

In response to the military judge’s court order questioning sua sponte the convening authority, the government placed in evidence a stipulation of fact, an extract from the Eleventh District’s Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), and the testimony of Chief Boatswain’s Mate (BMC) Collins who was at the time the Appellant’s immediate supervisor. The stipulation of fact provided that:

1. ... [The] primary current assignment…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Runkle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. Swaim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Alejandro Margalli-Olvera v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Cooke v. OrserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API