Legal Opinion
New Jersey Zinc Co. v. Board of Review
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 24, 1957PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Jacobs, J.
These are consolidated appeals from determinations that the claimants were not disqualified under N. J. 8. A. 43:21-5(d) from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. The Yew Jersey Zinc Company and the Board of Review entered into a stipulation of facts which stated that although claims were made by 69 persons only eight cases were being presented “as involving the principal questions raised in all cases.”
In August 1955 a strike was called by the union at the mine and mill operated by the Yew Jersey Zinc Company at Ogdensburg. A…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Lumber & Sawmill Workers v. MillisSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Inland Empire District Council, Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union, Lewiston, Idaho v. MillisSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Babb v. BullittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
3Cited by15 opinions
- Empire Iron Mining Partnership v. OrhanenMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Oluschak Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- In Re MasielloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Scott v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1962
- Malady v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. OF EMP. SECURITYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.