Legal Opinion
Fleet Aerospace Corp. v. Holderman
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 11, 1986No. C-2-86-0556PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HOLSCHUH, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTORY
This case presents a direct challenge to the constitutionality of Ohio legislation enacted in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Edgar v. MITE Corp., 457 U.S. 624, 102 S.Ct. 2629, 73 L.Ed.2d 269 (1982), which “sounded the death knell for state control of federally regulated tender offers.” 1 The Ohio Control Share Acquisition Act attempts to restrict federally regulated tender offers in a different manner and to a different degree than the “first generation” of such state statutes but, as discussed below, the state statute…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fleet Aerospace Corp. v. HoldermanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Buckhorn, Inc. v. Ropak Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
- Gelco Corp. v. Coniston PartnersDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Fleet Aerospace Corp. v. HoldermanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- CRTF Corp. v. Federated Department StoresDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.