Legal Opinion
Neuman v. Goldberg
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1993No. 93 Civ. 2092 (RWS)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Clayton Neuman, Andy Briant, and Alan Kadat, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, members of a putative class, (the “Plaintiffs”) have moved to remand this action against Arthur Goldberg et al (the “Defendants”) to the Supreme Court of the State of New York. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
The Parties
The Plaintiffs purchased securities through investments generally of between $150,000 and $170,000 per unit in the form of cash and promissory notes in approximately 150 privately offered limited…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- ML Media Partners, LP v. Century/ML Cable Venture (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Renaissance Cosmetics, Inc. v. Development Specialists Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- MT. McKINLEY INSURANCE COMPANY v. CORNING INCORPORATEDCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Hunnicutt Co. v. TJX Companies, Inc. (In Re Ames Department Stores, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Hyatt Corp. v. StantonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.