Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. Musclewood Inv. Props., LLC

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided October 5, 2018No. B280928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKim, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Oscar Ruiz is a disabled person who uses a guide dog. He alleged that defendants Edward Lopez and Musclewood Investment Properties, LLC (Musclewood)1 violated his rights under the Disabled Persons Act ( Civ. Code, § 54 et seq. ) (DPA),2 by allowing their guard dog to interfere with and attack his guide dog. Plaintiff contends the trial court erred by sustaining a demurrer to his cause of action under the DPA without leave to amend. We agree and reverse. We also reverse the order granting the motion to strike.

II. BACKGROUND

A. Procedural History Prior to First Amended…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Evans v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Amezcua v. L.A. County Civil Service Com.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. Evans v. Bird Rides, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. MES Investments, LLC v. Dadson Washer Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. MES Investments, LLC v. Dadson Washer Service, Inc. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Martinez v. Cot'n Wash, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API