Lumberas v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for sale of phentermine. 1 After finding appellant guilty, the jury assessed appellant’s punishment at nine years’ confinement.
In reviewing the record we have determined that the judgment must be reversed because of unassigned error. Art. 40.09(13), Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.
In Riddle v. State, 560 S.W.2d 642 (Tex.Cr.App.1977), the defendant was charged with delivery of phentermine. In Riddle we held that there is no longer any penalty provided for the possession or delivery of phentermine. For the reasons stated in Riddle this rule also…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Riddle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grady v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Chalin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Ex Parte AshcraftCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Ex parte PageCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.