Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ashcraft

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1978No. 57857PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DALLY, Judge.

This is a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus proceeding. See Art. 11.07, V.A.C. C.P. The petitioner was convicted for possessing “phentermine, an isomer of methamphetamine,” and is serving the sentence for that conviction.

The petitioner, relying on Riddle v. State, 560 S.W.2d 642 (Tex.Cr.App.1977), and Lumberas v. State, 560 S.W.2d 644 (Tex.Cr.App.1977), asserts that his conviction for the possession of phentermine is void and that he is entitled to be released from confinement.

The defendants in Riddle v. State, supra, and Lumberas v. State, supra, were prosecuted for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Gaines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Ex Parte TaylorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Owens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Ex Parte McKayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Chalin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API