Legal Opinion
Chalin v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided January 12, 1983No. 61277PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*267OPINION
ROBERTS, Judge.
A jury found the appellant guilty of delivery of “a controlled substance, namely Phentermine, an isomer of Methamphetamine.” The court assessed a punishment of eight years’ confinement.
In his first ground of error, the appellant claims phentermine was not intended to be included in the statutory reference to “Methamphetamine, including its .. . isomers .... ” Texas Controlled Substances Act (V.A.C.S. Article 4476 — 15), Section 4.02(b)(6). This argument was rejected in Ex parte Wilson, 588 S.W.2d 905, 907 (Tex.Cr.App.1979).
In his second ground of error the appellant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Davidson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1987
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Dudley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
- Porter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.