Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Nolen

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 19, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARMER, Judge.

This appeal is from judgment affording liability coverage to Appellee Reynolds under the insurance policy issued him by Appellant.

Appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) issued an automobile liability insurance policy to Appellee Ule Reynolds (“Reynolds”) and wife, Minnie (Mamie) Reynolds. The policy insured the Reynolds’s 1984 Buick LeSabre and contained the following language:

We will:

1. pay damages which an insured becomes legally liable to pay because of: a. bodily injury to others, and

caused by accident resulting from the ownership,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kangas v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Morris v. American Liability & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Maness v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Coleman v. SanfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spradlin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Thibodeaux v. J M Drilling L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2021
  3. Thibodeaux v. J M Drilling L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API