Legal Opinion

Application of Carl Dalton Lunsford

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 13, 1964No. Patent Appeal 7105PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1, 2, 5, 10, 11, 22 and 23 in application serial No. 799,-441 filed March 16, 1959 for BASIC ESTERS OF 3-ARYL-3-PYRROLIDI-NOLS. Three claims were allowed by the examiner.

Appellant’s application is directed to certain acyloxy derivatives of 3-aryl-3-pyrrolidinols. The specification states that representative compounds of appellant’s invention “exhibit a predominant utility and activity as anodyne type anti-tussive agents 1 or expectorants in animals.” It is further stated that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumüller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BänderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. Application of Carl D. LunsfordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Davis-Edwards Pharmacal Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  4. Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  5. Application of Philip M. CarabateasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API