Application of Carl Dalton Lunsford
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1, 2, 5, 10, 11, 22 and 23 in application serial No. 799,-441 filed March 16, 1959 for BASIC ESTERS OF 3-ARYL-3-PYRROLIDI-NOLS. Three claims were allowed by the examiner.
Appellant’s application is directed to certain acyloxy derivatives of 3-aryl-3-pyrrolidinols. The specification states that representative compounds of appellant’s invention “exhibit a predominant utility and activity as anodyne type anti-tussive agents 1 or expectorants in animals.” It is further stated that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
3Cited by17 opinions
- Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumüller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BänderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Carl D. LunsfordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Davis-Edwards Pharmacal Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Application of Philip M. CarabateasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.