Legal Opinion
Conforti v. City of Manchester
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 29, 1996No. 94-709PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
The plaintiff, Andrew Conforti, and the intervenors, Orion Theatre, Inc. and Robert A. Howe, appeal a ruling of the *79Superior Court (O’Neill, J.) that the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) of the City df Manchester (city) correctly concluded that the city zoning ordinance did not permit live entertainment on the property owned by the plaintiff and leased to the intervenors, and that live entertainment was not a preexisting, nonconforming use of the property, which, at the time of enactment of the ordinance, was used only as a movie theater. We affirm.
The plaintiff owns the Empire Theater in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Healey v. New Durham Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- New London v. LeskiewiczSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- New London Land Use Ass'n v. New London Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Town of Hampton v. BrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Nash Family Investment Properties v. Town of HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- County of Santa Fe v. Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Peabody v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Town of Salem v. WicksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Hurley v. Town of HollisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.