Suttles v. Blue Ridge Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
The defendant’s only exception is to the failure of the trial judge to sustain its motion for judgment of nonsuit. This simply challenges the right of plaintiff to recover for his loss under the terms of the insurance contract.
The only limitations on the plaintiff’s use of his automobile were set out in the policy as “Use: Business and Pleasure” and “Exclusions . . . (a),” which states, “This policy does not apply under any of the coverages, while the automobile is used as a public or livery conveyance . . .”
The defendant argues in its brief that the destruction of the plaintiff’s car did not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. American Compounding Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Pauli v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1938
- The LIFE & CAS. INS. CO. &C. v. BenionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Hallock v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
3Cited by5 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Peggy Joyce HenkelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Sullivan v. Great Plains InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Bruce v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1954
- Thomas v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Morton v. BLUE RIDGE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961