Legal Opinion

Pauli v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1938PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVaughan, J.

It appears either by stipulation or from the evidence offered upon the trial that the defendant on June 22, 1936, sold and delivered to one Kenneth Carncross a policy contract of liability and property damage insurance insuring the said Carncross against liability for bodily injury and property damage caused by the operation of his automobile while being used for “business and pleasure.” It further appears that during the coverage period the insured, Kenneth Carncross, was involved in an automobile accident resulting in the fatal injury to Esther M. Pauli, to her daughter, Esther M. Pauli…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Didlake v. Standard Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  2. General Insurance Company of America, and Interveners, Sherman L. Jones v. Western Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. The Western Casualty and Surety Company, a Corporation v. Margy Herman, Mark Lowell Herman, and Leo NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  4. Mid-States Insurance v. BrandonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  5. Western States Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API