Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 5, 1964No. 4095PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, Judge.

Plaintiffs Robert L. Thomas and Ruth Thomas, his wife, have regularly appealed an adverse judgment in their suit on an automobile insurance policy consequent upon damage to the automobile and disclaimer of liability by the defendant carrier. The appeal is premised on the asserted insufficiency of the answer and the evidence to establish alleged fraudulent misrepresentation by the insured so as to relieve the defendant insurer of its obligation under the policy.

*?Plaintiff Robert L. Thomas was connected by agency employment with a certain insurance company for several years. He…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. American Compounding Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. The LIFE & CAS. INS. CO. &C. v. BenionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. Suttles v. Blue Ridge InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rigot v. BucciSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Entron, Inc., Etc. v. General Cablevision of Palatka, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Erie Insurance Exchange v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Hester v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968
  5. Finney v. FrostDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API