Legal Opinion
Umphlett v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 27, 1995No. C6-94-2331PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Appellant Timothy Wayne Umphlett challenges the district court’s order sustaining the revocation of his driver’s license, arguing that (1) he was denied an opportunity for an additional test, (2) his limited right to counsel was not vindicated because he was not given a reasonable time to contact an attorney, and (3) the doctrine of State v. Scales, 518 N.W.2d 587 (Minn.1994) (requiring police officers to record custodial interrogation of suspects) should apply to implied consent proceedings. We affirm.
FACTS
On August 7, 1994, a state trooper arrested appellant Timothy…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. SalitrosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. VictorsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. GilmartinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Modaff v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.