Legal Opinion

State v. Lopez

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 10, 1995No. C9-95-714, C0-95-715 and C2-95-716PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

In this consolidated appeal from three separate DWI convictions, appellants challenge the trial court’s denial of their motions to exclude evidence obtained after unrecorded implied consent advisories were given, based *706on its holding that the reading of an implied consent advisory is not a custodial interrogation triggering the electronic recording requirement set forth in State v. Scales, 518 N.W.2d 587 (Minn.1994). We affirm.

FACTS

Appellants Linda R. Lopez, Daniel J. She-kore, and Roger D. Albro were arrested on separate occasions for driving under the influence of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SletteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  2. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API