State v. Lopez
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
In this consolidated appeal from three separate DWI convictions, appellants challenge the trial court’s denial of their motions to exclude evidence obtained after unrecorded implied consent advisories were given, based *706on its holding that the reading of an implied consent advisory is not a custodial interrogation triggering the electronic recording requirement set forth in State v. Scales, 518 N.W.2d 587 (Minn.1994). We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants Linda R. Lopez, Daniel J. She-kore, and Roger D. Albro were arrested on separate occasions for driving under the influence of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. SletteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995