Legal Opinion

Fuglseth v. Quintero

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1997No. Docket No. 189578Published

1Per curiam

Intervenors James, Timothy, Tamela, and Robert Fuglseth appeal as of right from the probate court’s order denying their motion for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether they are heirs of decedent Rudolph Quintero, Sr. We affirm the probate court’s decision to grant respondents Theresa and Rudolph Quintero, Jr., summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (C)(5) and to deny intervenors’ request.

i

The decedent and his wife, Oralia (Lila) Quintero, had two children, Theresa and Rudolph, Jr. Intervenors claim that they are the adult children from an extramarital relationship between…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Marquis v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Altman v. Meridian TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Heinz v. Chicago Road Investment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Girard v. WagenmakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API