Legal Opinion
Castillo v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 2001No. B143598PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, J.
Plaintiff appeals from summary judgment entered against him in this wrongful termination action. The summary judgment was granted based upon final determinations in an earlier administrative action. We find no triable issue of material fact and affirm the judgment.
Factual and Procedural Summary
Edward Castillo, Jr., worked for the Bureau of Engineering in the Department of Public Works of the City of Los Angeles for 29 years. In June 1996, he was dismissed for cause. According to the city, this action was taken because of his repeated unauthorized absences and tardiness.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Karin White v. City of PasadenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Peters v. Rivers Edge Mining, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Murphy v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Murray v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Rodgers v. Sargent Controls & AerospaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.