Legal Opinion

Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Schmidt

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 4, 1934No. [No. 8, January Term, 1934.]PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

A suit on an accident and health disability policy issued in 1930 is defended by the insurance company in this case on the ground of false statements contained in a form of application upon which the policy was issued, and which was embodied at length as part of the policy. The plaintiff has replied that the agent of the company filled in the statements without knowledge or fraudulent participation on the part of the plaintiff, and that the company with knowledge of the misrepresentations possessed by their agent had issued the policy and accepted payment of premiums. The trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Stiegler v. Eureka Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Ryan v. World Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
  4. Lewis v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
  5. Mutual Life Insurance v. MullanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Modisette v. Foundation Reserve Insurance Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SamisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  3. Monumental Life Insurance v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Silberstein v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  5. Fitzgerald v. Franklin Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API