Legal Opinion

Cobell v. Babbitt

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 21, 1999No. 96-1285PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court after a six-week bench trial and the submission of an administrative record, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law by both sides, and responses thereto. Upon consideration of these materials and the record in this case, the court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Table of Contents

I. Introduction. Ci

II. Findings of Fact.

A. History Sumvunding IIM Trust Establishment.

B. The IIM Trust. ⅞0

C. The Indian Trust Fund Management Reform Act of 199J

D.…

2Cases cited66 opinions

Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, GaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, GaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
Western Watersheds Project v. PoolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.