Legal Opinion

MICHAEL SANDERS v. UNITED STATES

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 2015No. 14-CF-129PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLEESE, Associate Judge:

Appellant Michael Sanders seeks reversal of his conviction for assault with intent to commit robbery (“AWIR”). Mr. Sanders argues that the jury was not given adequate guidance in response to a jury note about an element of the offense. We agree. Concluding that the error was not harmless, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

The government presented the following evidence at trial. On May 17, 2013', Hoa Truong was riding a Metro train. According to Mr. Truong, as the train approached the Brookland Metro station, a person whom Mr. Truong later identified as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Murchison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Longus v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Potter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LAMONT L. BUSKEY and KEITH A. SIMMS v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Patschak v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. The Estate of Jane Doe 202 v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API