MICHAEL SANDERS v. UNITED STATES
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
McLEESE, Associate Judge:
Appellant Michael Sanders seeks reversal of his conviction for assault with intent to commit robbery (“AWIR”). Mr. Sanders argues that the jury was not given adequate guidance in response to a jury note about an element of the offense. We agree. Concluding that the error was not harmless, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
The government presented the following evidence at trial. On May 17, 2013', Hoa Truong was riding a Metro train. According to Mr. Truong, as the train approached the Brookland Metro station, a person whom Mr. Truong later identified as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Murchison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Longus v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Potter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- LAMONT L. BUSKEY and KEITH A. SIMMS v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Patschak v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- The Estate of Jane Doe 202 v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023