Legal Opinion

Eckart v. Davis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1994No. 70A05-9311-CV-437PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

Today we decide who is responsible for interest on a note secured by a mortgage following a sale of real estate and the partial assumption of the note and mortgage by the buyers. Appellant-defendants Carol and Gerald Eckart contest the determination that they were responsible for interest on their portion of the principal of a note the appel-lee-plaintiffs Peggy and Gary Davis assumed. The Eckarts also dispute the amount of the interest award and the trial court's denial of their motion to amend the pleadings on their defense of laches.

FACTS

On October 22, 1979, the Eckarts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hauck v. Second National Bank of RichmondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Marriage of Svetich v. SvetichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Jackson v. DeFabisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Hardiman v. Governmental Interinsurance ExchangeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. INB Banking Co. v. Opportunity Options, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Oxford Financial Group, Ltd. v. EvansIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Roy A. Miller & Sons, Inc. v. Industrial Hardwoods Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Ostrander v. Board of Directors of Porter County Education InterlocalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Bailey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Steven Weinreb v. Fannie MaeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API