State v. Tucker
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The defendant, Joel Tucker, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 53-21,1 and from the judgment of viola*508tion of probation. The defendant claims that (1) § 53-21 is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the facts of this case, 2 (2) given the trial court’s instructions regarding what constitutes an act under § 53-21, there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict, and (3) the trial court improperly refused to set aside the violation of probation charge…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. SivriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. PickeringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. Robert H.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- In re Michael L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. Robert H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.