Legal Opinion

Stansell v. American Radiator Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1910No. Docket No. 20PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Murfin, J. Bill to quiet title by Arthur D. Stansell against the American Radiator Company. From a decree dismissing complainant’s bill, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

On April 11, 1885, M. J. Murphy & Company, the predecessor of the Murphy Chair Company, purchased certain land in Detroit and a right of way over a 30-foot strip furnishing an outlet to Russell street. Subsequently, this property and easement were acquired by the Murphy Chair Company. Briggs and Sill, the originators of the American Can Company, on July 27, 1899, purchased land abutting on the 30-foot strip and on Russell street and Trombley avenue, with an easement for a railway track across the 30-foot strip. On December 21, 1899, Murphy, Wasey & Company purchased the parcel east of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Atlantic Dock Co. v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. D. M. Goodwillie Co. v. Commonwealth Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Dubois v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Winston v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. City of Detroit v. Detroit City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Murphy Chair Co. v. American Radiator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Fry v. KaiserMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Whatley v. WoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Kern v. SchaarMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API