Legal Opinion

Chickering v. Faile

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1865PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county. This cause has been twice before this court, between the same parties, and is reported in 26 Ill. 507, and 29 Ill. 294. In this appeal, William S. Johnson and his assignees are added parties defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Walker

After again reviewing and giving the questions decided in this case when previously before us a careful consideration, we see no reason to be dissatisfied with the conclusions there announced. The portions of the premises then held not to be subject to redemption by reason of the bar of the statute of limitations, we must consider as being still exempt from redemption. We therefore feel it unnecessary to again discuss the questions then presented and passed upon by the court.

When the case was before us, as reported in 29 Ill. 294, it was held that the color of title and payment of taxes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chickering v. FailesIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Cofield v. FurryIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Dawley v. Van CourtIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Darst v. MarshallIllinois Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. BulteMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Weare v. Van MeterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. State v. Eureka Consolidated Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Elston v. KennicottIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Bender v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API