Legal Opinion

Hanna Furnace Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 5, 1940No. 43293PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

Plaintiff’s suit is based on two grounds: (1) It alleges tliat the Commissioner, in computing the taxpayer’s liability for 1918, erroneously decreased its invested capital by deducting in prior years depreciation on certain of its blast furnaces prior to the time they.had been completed and put in operation; and (2) that no deduction was taken for depreciation on the linings of its blast furnaces in the taxable year.

The defendant defends on the ground, among others, that no claim for refund on these grounds was filed within the statutory period. The plaintiff replies to this that a general…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bemis Bro. Bag Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. Henry Prentiss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. Factors & Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. United States v. Bertelsen & Petersen Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Pratt & Whitney Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Insuranshares & General Management Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
  2. Berch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  3. Baltimore & O. R. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API