Legal Opinion

People v. McNabb

California Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1889No. 20538PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yuba County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.

Appellant was tried on a charge of murder, and convicted of manslaughter. He appeals from the judgment, and his contention here is that the court erred in its charge of the jury. The alleged error consists in the reading by the court of the opinion of this court in People v. Munn, 65 Cal. 211, and stating tó th-e jury that that case “was in many respects like the one at bar.”

Whether this statement was correct, we have not the means of verifying, as the evidence is not before us.

In the case of People v. Munn, the appellant had been *420convicted of murder in the second degree, and this court held…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. MunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jordan v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. J. M. Winchester v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Commercial Union Assur. Co. v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Springfield F. & M. Ins. v. Hays & SonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Springfield F. & M. Ins. v. Hays & SonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API