Springfield F. & M. Ins. v. Hays & Son
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garvin County; R. McMillan, Judge. Actions by Hays & Son against the Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance Company and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and défendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants in error, Hays Son, a co-partnership composed of Rosa Belle Hays and Bert Chester Hays, brought seven separate actions in the district court of Garvin county, Okla., on as many different policies of insurance, two of which were issued by the plaintiff in error Northwestern National Insurance Company, and one each by the other plaintiffs in error. Prior to trial the cases were, by agreement of the parties and proper order of court, all consolidated, and were thereafter proceeded with to final judgment as one case. The policies all contain the following condition, a breach…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Travellers' Insurance v. McConkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Uhrig v. . Williamsburgh City Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Bishop v. Agricultural InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- American Central Insurance v. Heath & BlackwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- School District No. 1 v. Globe & Republic Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1965
- Keesling v. Western Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Boston Ins. Co. v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society v. RayorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- Queen Ins. Co. of America v. DalrympleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.