Legal Opinion

Weems v. State by and through Fox

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2019No. DA 18-0308PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Beth Baker delivered the Opinion of the Court.

***353¶1 Twenty years ago, this Court held that a statute preventing a woman from obtaining a lawful medical procedure-a pre-viability abortion-from a health care provider of her choosing unconstitutionally infringed her right to individual privacy under Montana's Constitution.

*7Armstrong v. State , 1999 MT 261, ¶¶ 2, 75, 296 Mont. 361, 989 P.2d 364. We used the term "health care provider"

to refer to any physician, physician assistant-certified, nurse, nurse-practitioner or other professional who has been determined by the appropriate…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wolfson v. BrammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Deerfield Medical Center, Medallion Executive Consultants, Inc. v. City of Deerfield Beach, City Commission of Deerfield BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Armstrong v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Gryczan v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. M.A.I.D. LLC v. STATEMontana Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Planned Parenthood v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Weems v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Advocates v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Planned Parenthood v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2024

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API