Weems v. State by and through Fox
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice Beth Baker delivered the Opinion of the Court.
***353¶1 Twenty years ago, this Court held that a statute preventing a woman from obtaining a lawful medical procedure-a pre-viability abortion-from a health care provider of her choosing unconstitutionally infringed her right to individual privacy under Montana's Constitution.
*7Armstrong v. State , 1999 MT 261, ¶¶ 2, 75, 296 Mont. 361, 989 P.2d 364. We used the term "health care provider"
to refer to any physician, physician assistant-certified, nurse, nurse-practitioner or other professional who has been determined by the appropriate…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolfson v. BrammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Deerfield Medical Center, Medallion Executive Consultants, Inc. v. City of Deerfield Beach, City Commission of Deerfield BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Armstrong v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Gryczan v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- M.A.I.D. LLC v. STATEMontana Supreme Court · 2024
- Planned Parenthood v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2024
- Weems v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2023
- Advocates v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2022
- Planned Parenthood v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.