Legal Opinion

Stockstad v. Town of Rutland

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

The amended complaint alleges as a first cause of action that Janet, Karen, Milla, and Harley Stock-stad are minors residing with their father, Joseph Stockstad, within the defendant township, and:

“3. That on or about the 30th day of March, 1946, the town board did duly authorize and did have improved, a certain town road abutting the premises owned by and resided upon by Joseph Stockstad and his family; that the town board and its agents during the course of improving said road, raised a grade thereof and removed a culvert, thereby closing a pre-existing waterway and converting the course of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hughes v. City of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Folk v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Bunker v. City of HudsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Matson v. Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Gilluly v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bostco LLC v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Boyer v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Andersen v. Village of Little ChuteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  5. In Re WeinholdUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API