Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Knapp

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 10, 2004PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

The question we must decide on a reservation and report from a single justice of this court is whether any provision of G. L. c. 123A permits the release of a person on *158probationary conditions after a judge has found probable cause to believe that the person is sexually dangerous and the Commonwealth has petitioned for a trial. We conclude that the statutory scheme requires that such a person be confined in a secure facility until the conclusion of trial, and that such a requirement does not violate the due process protections of the United States Constitution.1

Background. The respondent,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Atwood v. VilsackSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 1211 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. NievesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. BradwayMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. GillisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API