Railtech Boutet, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
I. INTRODUCTION
BARZILAY, Judge:
The import invoice for the subject merchandise in this case identifies the product in French as “charge aluminothermique pour procede: QP.” Its proper identification for purposes of classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS” or “Tariff Schedule”) is the central issue before the court. Plaintiff, Railtech Boutet, Inc. (“Railtech”), imported the subject merchandise from France through the Port of Detroit. On January 19, 1993, Plaintiff protested the initial classification of the United States Customs Service…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.