Legal Opinion

Railtech Boutet, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 22, 2003No. Court 96-01-00265Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

I. INTRODUCTION

BARZILAY, Judge:

The import invoice for the subject merchandise in this case identifies the product in French as “charge aluminothermique pour procede: QP.” Its proper identification for purposes of classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS” or “Tariff Schedule”) is the central issue before the court. Plaintiff, Railtech Boutet, Inc. (“Railtech”), imported the subject merchandise from France through the Port of Detroit. On January 19, 1993, Plaintiff protested the initial classification of the United States Customs Service…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API