John M. Denman Oil Co. v. State Corp. Commission of the State
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Leben, J.:
John M. Denman Oil Company has appealed a Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) order that Denman Oil must plug 41 abandoned oil wells. Denman Oil contends that only one party may be held legally responsible for the wells under K.S.A. *9955-179 and that since another party took over the mineral lease from Denman Oil, it is no longer responsible.
But K.S.A. 55-179(b) provides that “a person who is legally responsible shall include, but is not limited to, one or more” of several parties defined in that statute. And one of those who may be held responsible is “the original operator who . . .…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Kansas Department of Revenue v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Robinson v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Golden Rule Insurance Co. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- Nunn v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Estate of RickabaughCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
- In re Estate of RickabaughCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
- State v. WaliallahCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018