Kansas Department of Revenue v. Powell
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Nuss, J.:
This case concerns a refusal to award attorney fees. The Kansas Department of Revenue (KDR) was the prevailing party in a Civil Service Board (Board) action initiated by Jill Powell under the Kansas Whistleblower Act, K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 75-2973. The Board’s order denying KDR attorney fees was affirmed by the district court and the Kansas Court of Appeals. We granted KDR’s petition for review; jurisdiction is under K.S.A. 20-3018(b).
The basic issue on appeal is whether the Board abused its discretion in denying the KDR fees motion under K.S.A.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kansas Racing Management, Inc. v. Kansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Fort Hays State University v. Fort Hays State University ChapterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Graham v. Dokter Trucking GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Kansas v. McElroySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. v. PraegerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Golden Rule Insurance Co. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- Milano's, Inc. v. Kansas Department of LaborSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- State v. ChavezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- In re the Appeal of BurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Gaumer v. ROSSVILLE TRUCK AND TRACTOR CO.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.