Legal Opinion

Hillerby v. Town of Colchester

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 26, 1997No. 96-243PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*272Allen, CJ.

The following question has been certified for review by this Court pursuant to V.R.A.E 5(b): “Whether the traditional governmental/proprietary distinctions in municipal tort immunity law should be replaced with the so-called private-analog test as now employed in state tort claims under 12 V.S.A. § 5601?” Because of the Legislature’s approval of the governmental/proprietary distinction and the complex policy issues involved, we hold that the abrogation and replacement of the distinction are matters for the Legislature, not the courts.

Plaintiff was riding his bicycle across a grassy…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hay v. Medical Center Hosp. of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  2. Hudson v. Town of East MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. Denis Bail Bonds, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. Marshall v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  5. Baxter v. Winooski Turnpike Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1849

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Doe v. ForrestSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  3. McMurphy v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. Morway v. TromblySupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. O'CONNOR v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API