Legal Opinion
Maddern v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1946No. Civ. No. 12960PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff brought this action under the Public Liability Act of 1923 (Stats. 1923, p. 675; 2 Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 5619) to recover damages for personal injuries to himself and damages to his automobile, sustained when, while driving on Bush Street between Franklin Street and Van Ness Avenue in San Francisco, the pavement *744collapsed and his ear sunk into the depression. The action was tried before a jury, and a verdict rendered in plaintiff’s favor for $3,585. From the judgment entered pursuant thereto the defendant city has appealed.
The accident happened about 10:30 in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Nicholson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Bellman v. San Francisco High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Laurenzi v. VranizanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Rafferty v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barrett v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Fielder v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Gentekos v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Rhodes v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Anderson v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.